Why It Matters — memios
memios / Why It Matters

The science
is overwhelming.
The gap is not.

Over 2,800 randomized controlled trials document what happens when cancer patients exercise.[1,2] The outcomes are extraordinary. The referral rate remains at 15 percent.[3] Here is what the evidence says — and why every patient deserves access to it.

2,800+
peer-reviewed RCTs documenting exercise oncology benefits[1,2]
18M
cancer survivors in the US without structured exercise support[4]
85%
of patients who never receive an exercise referral[3]
162
US cities with no exercise oncology program at all[12]
The clinical evidence

Exercise is not a wellness add-on.
It is clinical medicine.

For decades, the instinct when facing cancer was rest. Protect. Conserve. Wait until treatment ends before thinking about movement. That instinct was deeply human — and it was wrong.

The evidence that has accumulated over the last three decades is not tentative. It is not preliminary. It spans every major cancer type, every treatment modality, every phase of care — from the week before surgery to decades of survivorship. The message is consistent and clear.

"If exercise could be consumed as a pill, everyone would be taking one or two every day of their life."[2]

ASCO — the American Society of Clinical Oncology — formally mandated in 2022 that medical oncologists should refer all cancer patients to structured exercise programming.[5] The American Cancer Society, ACSM, the American Heart Association, and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network have issued consistent guidelines. This is not fringe science. It is the established standard of care — honored in publication and ignored in practice.

The gap between what science proves and what patients receive is not a knowledge problem. It is an infrastructure problem. There is no referral pathway. There are not enough credentialed professionals. There is no platform connecting the evidence to the patient. That is what memios is building.

Nine documented outcomes

These are not projected benefits. They are outcomes documented across 2,800+ peer-reviewed randomized controlled trials, endorsed by every major oncology guideline body.

50%
Fatigue Reduction
Cancer-related fatigue severity reduced by up to 50% with structured exercise — outperforming every pharmaceutical intervention studied.[6]
Protected
Heart Health
Exercise protects cardiovascular function from cardiotoxic chemotherapy damage and reduces long-term cardiac risk.[8,13]
Preserved
Muscle Strength
Resistance training prevents dangerous cancer-related muscle loss (sarcopenia), improving treatment tolerance and prognosis.[7,14]
Lifted
Depression and Anxiety
Exercise reduces depression and anxiety scores with effectiveness matching therapy and medication — and restores patient agency.[9]
−32%
Surgical Readmissions
Prehabilitation programs reduce 30-day post-surgical readmissions by approximately one-third.[15]
Higher
Quality of Life
Exercise consistently improves patient-reported quality of life across every cancer type and treatment phase studied.[10]
−1.8 days
Hospital Stay
Prehabilitated surgical patients leave hospital an average 1.5–2 days sooner, driving direct savings per patient.[15]
−31%
Cancer Mortality
Post-diagnosis physical activity linked to 31% reduced cancer-specific mortality, 22% lower recurrence, 45% lower all-cause mortality in breast cancer.[11]
The access crisis

The evidence base is extraordinary.
The delivery gap is unconscionable.

Over 2,800 clinical trials. Four major guideline bodies. A formal ASCO referral mandate. And still — 85 percent of cancer patients receive no exercise referral and no structured exercise support.[3,5] The failure is not scientific. It is structural.

Current referral and access rates in exercise oncology[3,12]
Cancer patients who receive an exercise referral15%
Oncologists who feel equipped to refer to exercise programs10%
Hillman Cancer Center: connection rate using EXCEEDS model45%
Patients who should be receiving an exercise referral100%
162[12]
US cities with a population over 50,000 that have no oncology rehabilitation or exercise oncology program within their borders
2M+[4]
New cancer diagnoses each year in the US — every patient should receive an exercise referral within days of diagnosis
$0[19]
Cost of the EXCEEDS triage protocol per patient — 3 to 5 minutes of staff time at the second chemotherapy infusion is all it takes

Why does this gap exist?

The gap is not caused by lack of evidence. It is caused by lack of infrastructure. Most hospitals have no exercise oncology referral pathway embedded in their EHR. Most oncologists have no credentialed exercise specialist to refer to. Most cancer patients are never told that exercise is not just safe but clinically essential.

Geospatial analysis by Schmitz et al. (2025) mapped over 2,100 exercise oncology programs across the country. 162 US cities with populations exceeding 50,000 had no program at all.[12] Rural, low-income, and minority communities were disproportionately underserved.

The EXCEEDS triage model — implemented at the UPMC Hillman Cancer Center using just 3 to 5 minutes of staff time per patient at the second chemotherapy infusion — achieved a 45 percent patient connection rate to exercise services.[19] That outcome is not exceptional. It is what is possible when the right infrastructure is in place.

What memios does about it.

memios builds the infrastructure. The EXCEEDS triage workflow, embedded in hospital EHR systems. The network of CETI-certified Cancer Exercise Specialists, placed in hospital programs. The telehealth delivery model that reaches patients in the 162 cities with no local program.[16]

The platform covers all four phases of care — prehabilitation, active treatment, post-procedure recovery, and long-term survivorship — in a single integrated system. Every patient interaction generates structured, validated clinical outcomes data. Every data point is documented in the formats accreditation bodies and payers require.

The science is done. The guidelines are written. The mandate exists. memios makes it real for the patient sitting in the infusion chair who has never been told that moving could help.

The continuum of care

Exercise support for every
phase of the cancer journey.

Most patients receive fragmented support — help at one point in their treatment, nothing at others. memios is the only platform that walks alongside a patient from the day of diagnosis through the rest of their life.

1
Before treatment begins
Prehabilitation

The window between diagnosis and surgery or first treatment is among the most powerful opportunities to change outcomes. Even two to three weeks of structured prehab reduces surgical complications, shortens hospital stays, and sends patients into treatment with greater physical and psychological reserves.[15]

Baseline assessment Strength and aerobic conditioning Nutrition optimization Surgical risk reduction
2
During chemotherapy, radiation, or hormone therapy
Active Treatment Support

Exercise during active treatment is not only safe — it is essential. A certified Cancer Exercise Specialist designs each session around the patient's treatment schedule, monitors vital signs, tracks daily fatigue and distress, and communicates directly with the oncology team. Patients exercise smarter, not harder.[5,6]

Treatment-adapted exercise Fatigue management Daily symptom tracking Care team coordination
3
After surgery or treatment completion
Post-Procedure Recovery

Post-procedure rehabilitation is where structured exercise makes the most immediate and visible difference. The memios care team coordinates with the surgical team to begin appropriate movement as soon as it is safe, following cancer-specific protocols for every surgery type.[17]

Early mobilization (ERAS) Condition-specific rehab Lymphedema prevention Discharge transition plan
4
For the rest of your life
Long-Term Survivorship

Treatment ends. The effects of treatment do not — and neither does the benefit of exercise. For breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer survivors, meeting exercise guidelines is associated with 31% reduced cancer-specific mortality, 22% lower recurrence, and 45% lower all-cause mortality.[11] The memios survivorship program is designed for a lifetime.

Annual reassessment Late effects management Holistic wellness (8 domains) Survivor community
The policy mandate

The guidelines say the same thing.
The compliance gap is real.

Every major clinical organization has issued the same instruction. Every accreditation body is moving in the same direction. The science and the policy are aligned. The only remaining gap is the infrastructure to act on them — and that is what memios builds.

ASCO — American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2022
Exercise Oncology Referral Mandate

ASCO guidelines state that medical oncologists should refer all cancer patients undergoing treatment with curative intent to structured exercise programming. The guideline specifically recommends referral to certified exercise oncology professionals.[5]

Formal Mandate
ACSM — American College of Sports Medicine, 2019
Updated International Exercise Guidelines

A 17-institution international roundtable synthesized the evidence across 2,800+ clinical trials and issued updated guidelines recommending individualized aerobic and resistance exercise for all cancer patients. ACSM has submitted a draft National Coverage Determination to CMS.[1]

Active Guidelines
NAPBC — National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers, 2024
Exercise Documentation Requirement

NAPBC 2024 standards require that a documented exercise recommendation be placed in the medical record for every eligible breast cancer patient under oncology care. This is not aspirational — it is a compliance requirement that went into effect January 2024.[18]

Active Requirement — 2024
AHA — American Heart Association, 2019
Cardio-Oncology Rehabilitation Standard

The AHA issued a scientific statement establishing the CORE (Cardio-Oncology Rehabilitation) model for patients receiving cardiotoxic cancer treatments. Structured exercise during and after cardiotoxic therapy protects cardiac function and is supported by Medicare-reimbursable cardiac rehabilitation CPT codes.[8]

AHA Scientific Statement
ACS — American Cancer Society, 2022
Nutrition and Physical Activity Guidelines for Cancer Survivors

The ACS 2022 guidelines for cancer survivors recommend regular aerobic and resistance exercise and explicitly link post-diagnosis physical activity to reduced cancer-specific mortality, reduced recurrence risk, and reduced all-cause mortality across multiple cancer types.[7,11]

Active Guidelines
Commission on Cancer / CMS, Advancing
Accreditation Standards and NCD

The Commission on Cancer is advancing toward requiring exercise documentation across all 1,500+ accredited cancer programs. CMS is reviewing a draft National Coverage Determination for exercise oncology services. The policy era is beginning — and institutions and payers that act now will be ahead of it.[20,21]

Advancing Standard
The research timeline

15 years of evidence.
The field is only accelerating.

Exercise oncology has moved from a fringe idea to an established clinical discipline in 15 years. The pace of research, guideline development, and policy action has not slowed — it has accelerated. Understanding the arc helps explain why the memios moment is now.

2010
American College of Sports Medicine
First Published Exercise Guidelines for Cancer Survivors

Schmitz et al. publish the first comprehensive ACSM exercise guidelines for cancer survivors, marking the formal beginning of exercise oncology as an evidence-based clinical discipline. The guidelines establish safety and efficacy standards for exercise across major cancer types.[2]

Complete
2019
ACSM + AHA
Updated Guidelines and Cardio-Oncology Rehabilitation Statement

A 17-institution international roundtable publishes updated ACSM guidelines synthesizing 2,800+ clinical trials, establishing the evidence base for all major cancer types and treatment phases. The American Heart Association simultaneously issues its cardio-oncology rehabilitation statement establishing the CORE model for cardiotoxic treatment populations.[1,8]

Complete
2022
ASCO + ACS
ASCO Formal Referral Mandate and ACS Survivor Guidelines

ASCO issues guidelines formally mandating that all cancer patients be referred to exercise programming — establishing the first clear clinical obligation for oncologists.[5] The American Cancer Society simultaneously publishes updated survivor guidelines linking exercise to reduced mortality and recurrence across breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer.[7,11]

Complete
2024
NAPBC + Schmitz et al.
NAPBC Compliance Standard Takes Effect and Geospatial Analysis Published

NAPBC 2024 standards requiring documented exercise recommendations for breast cancer patients take effect — creating the first binding compliance obligation in exercise oncology for accredited breast centers.[18] Simultaneously, Schmitz et al. publish a landmark geospatial analysis mapping 2,100+ exercise oncology programs, identifying 162 US cities with no program and documenting systematic access disparities by geography, race, and income.[12]

Active Now
2025
Adsul, Pergolotti, and Schmitz — ASCO Educational Book
Implementation Science Framework Published

The definitive current synthesis of exercise oncology implementation science is published in the ASCO Educational Book. The paper presents comprehensive frameworks for embedding EXCEEDS, PERCS, CORE, CREST, and PGA triage models into oncology care delivery — and provides the implementation blueprint that underpins the memios hospital program design.[21]

Active Now
Soon
CMS + Commission on Cancer
National Coverage Determination and CoC Accreditation Requirements

ACSM has submitted a draft National Coverage Determination to CMS for exercise oncology services — the beginning of formal reimbursement policy. The Commission on Cancer is expected to advance documentation requirements across all 1,500+ accredited cancer programs. The institutions and payers building infrastructure today will define the standard when formal policy arrives.[20,21]

Pending
The workforce gap

The demand is there.
The specialists are not.

Even where hospitals want to implement exercise oncology programs, the shortage of credentialed Cancer Exercise Specialists creates a bottleneck that prevents care from reaching patients. memios is addressing this directly.

The workforce access picture[3,12]
162
US cities of 50,000+ with no exercise oncology program — meaning patients in those cities have no structured care pathway regardless of their oncologist's intent[12]
90%
of oncologists who say they need more knowledge to refer patients effectively to exercise programs — indicating the workforce shortage is compounded by a training gap[3]
80%+
patient retention rates in telehealth-delivered exercise oncology programs — proving that digital delivery reaches patients geography cannot[16]

The memios answer to the workforce shortage.

The memios certification pathway — delivered in partnership with the Cancer Exercise Training Institute (CETI) — creates a direct pipeline from the fitness and healthcare professional workforce to credentialed Cancer Exercise Specialist roles.

Physical trainers, physical therapists, nurses, and occupational therapists can earn the Cancer Exercise Specialist credential and be placed within memios hospital client programs. Telehealth delivery extends their reach beyond any single facility — a CES in one city can serve patients at three different hospital clients simultaneously.[16]

The memios platform handles the clinical infrastructure — exercise prescription builder, outcomes tracking, EHR integration, billing documentation — so the specialist focuses entirely on the patient.

The result is a scalable workforce model that matches the scale of the patient population that needs this care.

How memios works

Infrastructure, certification,
and outcomes. In one platform.

memios is not a single product. It is the infrastructure layer that connects every stakeholder in exercise oncology — patients, professionals, hospitals, and payers — into one functioning system.

1
Triage and Referral at Point of Care

The EXCEEDS screening algorithm, embedded in your EHR, fires at the second chemotherapy infusion. A CDS Hook alerts the oncologist. The referral is placed in 3 to 5 minutes of staff time.[19]

2
Baseline Assessment by Certified Specialist

Within 48 hours of referral, the patient completes a baseline assessment with a CETI-certified Cancer Exercise Specialist — in-clinic, via telehealth, or in a community setting. FACIT-Fatigue, PROMIS, and PHQ-9 are administered and recorded.

3
Personalized Exercise Prescription

The CES builds an individualized exercise prescription using the memios platform — phase-specific, cancer-specific, and adjusted daily for how the patient feels. Sessions are delivered in-clinic, via HIPAA-compliant video, or guided through the memios app.

4
Daily Symptom Monitoring

The memios patient app collects a 60-second daily check-in — fatigue, pain, mood, sleep, energy — using validated scales. Alerts escalate automatically to the clinical team when thresholds are crossed. The oncology team sees patient data in real time.[17]

5
Outcomes Documentation and Reporting

Validated clinical measures are tracked at every phase transition. Outcomes are structured for NAPBC compliance reporting, MIPS quality measures, HEDIS performance, and payer data partnerships — automatically, at the point of care.[18,21]

6
Lifetime Survivorship Program

At treatment completion, the memios survivorship program activates — annual reassessments, holistic wellness support across 8 domains, the Longevity Letter newsletter, and connection to the national survivor community. Exercise support does not end when treatment does.[11]

The science is done.
Now let us build the infrastructure.

Every cancer patient deserves access to what 2,800 clinical trials have proven can help them survive — and live well. memios is building the system that makes it real.

Research References

All statistics and clinical claims on this page are grounded in peer-reviewed research. Numbers in brackets correspond to the citations used throughout the page. Primary source: Adsul, Pergolotti, and Schmitz (2025), ASCO Educational Book, Vol. 45, Issue 3, e472854.

1
Campbell KL, Winters-Stone K, Wiskemann J, et al. Exercise guidelines for cancer survivors: consensus statement from international multidisciplinary roundtable. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019;51:2375–2390. (2,800+ RCT evidence base; updated ACSM guidelines.)
2
Schmitz KH, Courneya KS, Matthews C, et al. American College of Sports Medicine roundtable on exercise guidelines for cancer survivors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42:1409–1426. (First published ACSM guidelines for cancer survivors; first formal evidence-based framework.)
3
Ligibel JA, Pierce LJ, Bender CM, et al. Attention to diet, exercise, and weight in oncology care: results of an ASCO national patient survey. Cancer. 2022;128:2817–2825. (15% referral rate; 90% of oncologists needing more knowledge to refer patients.)
4
American Cancer Society. Cancer Treatment and Survivorship Facts and Figures 2022–2024. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2022. (18 million cancer survivors in the US; 2 million new diagnoses annually.)
5
Ligibel JA, Bohlke K, May AM, et al. Exercise, diet, and weight management during cancer treatment: ASCO guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40:2491–2507. (Formal ASCO mandate that all cancer patients receiving curative-intent treatment should be referred to exercise programming.)
6
Campbell KL et al. (ACSM 2019) and FACIT-Fatigue meta-analyses. Up to 50% reduction in cancer-related fatigue severity with structured exercise. Exercise outperforms all pharmaceutical interventions studied for cancer-related fatigue. Aerobic exercise is also the best-evidenced intervention for chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment (chemobrain).
7
Rock CL, Thomson CA, Sullivan KR, et al. American Cancer Society nutrition and physical activity guideline for cancer survivors. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72:230–262. (Resistance training preserves lean body mass; prevents sarcopenia during treatment; updated guidelines for survivorship exercise.)
8
Gilchrist SC, Barac A, Ades PA, et al. Cardio-oncology rehabilitation to manage cardiovascular outcomes in cancer patients and survivors: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019;139:e997–e1012. (CORE model; cardiotoxic treatment damage; exercise protects cardiovascular function; cardiac rehab CPT codes 93797-93799.)
9
Campbell KL et al. (ACSM 2019) and PHQ-9/GAD-7 outcomes across exercise oncology RCTs. Exercise reduces depression and anxiety scores in cancer patients with effectiveness comparable to pharmacological and psychotherapeutic interventions. PHQ-9 and GAD-7 measures used as primary endpoints.
10
Ligibel JA et al. (ASCO 2022) and FACT-G/PROMIS Global Health meta-analyses. Exercise consistently improves patient-reported quality of life across all cancer types and all treatment phases studied. PROMIS Physical Function and FACT-G used as primary endpoints in key trials.
11
Rock CL et al. (ACS 2022). Post-diagnosis physical activity linked to 31% reduced cancer-specific mortality, 22% reduced recurrence risk, and 45% reduced all-cause mortality in breast cancer meta-analysis. Similar associations documented for colorectal and prostate cancer survivorship populations.
12
Schmitz KH, Demanelis K, Crisafio ME, et al. Proximity to cancer rehabilitation and exercise oncology by geography, race, and socioeconomic status. Cancer. 2025;131:e35515. (Landmark geospatial analysis: 2,100+ programs mapped; 162 US cities of 50,000+ with no ORE program; systematic disparities by geography, race, and income.)
13
Viamonte SG, Joaquim AV, Alves AJ, et al. Cardio-oncology rehabilitation for cancer survivors with high cardiovascular risk: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2023;8:1119–1128. (Significant improvement in peak VO2 and quality of life in cardio-oncology rehabilitation RCT.)
14
Giri S, Al-Obaidi M, Weaver A, et al. Association between chronologic age and geriatric assessment–identified impairments in older adults with cancer. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2021;19:922–927. (Geriatric assessment impairments in 61% of patients aged 60–64; muscle mass and physical function as prognosis predictors.)
15
Stout NL, Brown JC, Schwartz AL, et al. An exercise oncology clinical pathway: screening and referral for personalized interventions. Cancer. 2020;126:2750–2758. (Prehabilitation reducing surgical complications, length of stay, and readmissions; ~32% 30-day readmission reduction; 1.5–2 day LOS reduction.)
16
Winters-Stone KM, Boisvert C, Li F, et al. Delivering exercise medicine to cancer survivors: has COVID-19 shifted the landscape for exercise oncology? Support Care Cancer. 2022;30:1903–1906. (Telehealth and online delivery; EXCEL study: 75%+ self-referral, 80%+ retention in rural/remote populations.)
17
Brennan L, Sheill G, Collier S, et al. Personalised exercise rehabilitation in cancer survivorship: the PERCS triage and referral system study protocol. BMC Cancer. 2024;24:517. (PERCS model; post-procedure rehabilitation; three-tier ORE level assignment; improved adherence and functional outcomes.)
18
National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers (NAPBC). Optimal Resources for Breast Care 2024 Standards. American College of Surgeons, 2025. (Documented exercise recommendation required in medical record for all eligible breast cancer patients under oncology care — effective January 2024.)
19
Schmitz KH, Chongaway A, Saeed A, et al. An initiative to implement a triage and referral system to make exercise and rehabilitation referrals standard of care in oncology. Support Care Cancer. 2024;32:259. (UPMC Hillman Cancer Center: 45% patient connection rate using EXCEEDS model; 3–5 minutes of staff time per patient at second chemotherapy infusion.)
20
Kennedy MA, Potiaumpai M, Maitin-Shepard M, et al. Looking back: a review of policy implications for exercise oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2023:140–148. (Policy review: reimbursement pathway comparison with Diabetes Prevention Program and peripheral artery disease supervised exercise; CMS NCD pathway analysis.)
21
Adsul P, Pergolotti M, Schmitz KH. Implementation science as the secret sauce for integrating exercise screening and triage pathways in oncology. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2025;45:e472854. (Primary synthesis: EPIS, CFIR, RE-AIM, ERIC, CaReR frameworks; EXCEEDS, PERCS, CORE, CREST, PGA triage models; CMS NCD submission; full implementation science review.)